<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking in code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.snowmoonsoftware.com/general/thinking-in-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.snowmoonsoftware.com/general/thinking-in-code/</link>
	<description>Connecting ideas to code</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:21:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.snowmoonsoftware.com/general/thinking-in-code/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.snowmoonsoftware.com/general/thinking-in-code/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Good catch! I&#039;ve updated the code in the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch! I&#8217;ve updated the code in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolfhub</title>
		<link>http://blogs.snowmoonsoftware.com/general/thinking-in-code/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolfhub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.snowmoonsoftware.com/general/thinking-in-code/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I think you made a small mistake here:

In the original it reads &quot;if (!p) return;&quot;

This should be equivalent to &quot;if (p == NULL) return;&quot;

In both cases, the function simply returns if the pointer p is not a valid one.

Otherwise, I very much agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you made a small mistake here:</p>
<p>In the original it reads &#8220;if (!p) return;&#8221;</p>
<p>This should be equivalent to &#8220;if (p == NULL) return;&#8221;</p>
<p>In both cases, the function simply returns if the pointer p is not a valid one.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I very much agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
